The Nature of Economics (6)


The Nature of Economics (6)
The household is an equally important part of the economy as the firm. But neoclassical economics has similarly avoided serious economic analyses of this economic unit by assuming that the utility function is exogenously given. This has caused many serious problems.
The household is important in the economy because it determines labor supply and labor quality. It also determines consumer demand. Indeed, a typical individual in the real world feels much of happiness in the household rather than in the firm or market. Nevertheless, neoclassical analyses of this problem is insufficient, biased, and harmful.
G. Becker has done some detailed analyses of the household but we do not know how they are incorporated into general equilibrium theory or if such incorporation generates efficient equilibrium. The whole system of economics needs to be considered.
As in the case of the firm, neoclassical economics lacks a theory of efficient human relations within the household. This causes it to lead people to believe that each family member is free to pursue his or her own self-interest as in the market. This theoretical defect has promoted disruption of the family in the real economy by accelerating trends towards the nuclear family, divorce, and child abuse. The market principle has invaded the family.
I guess that the high rates of divorce and child abuse are to a large extent results of increased competition in the workplace. People have thought that they are free to use or sacrifice the household in order to achieve occupational success and to relieve the stress experienced in the workplace. They have lost intension to keep harmonious human relations within the family as well as the will to develop competent children.
In this way the market logic has controlled whole society and people have sacrificed the efficiency within the household as well as within the firm. They have become too self-assertive and less cooperative in the household and firm. This is a result generated by neoclassical economics and neoliberalism.

Comments and questions are welcome.
kazuhiro.arai888@gmail.com

Kazuhiro Arai’s English twitter:       　https://twitter.com/araikazuhiroe88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese twitter:　     https://twitter.com/araikazuhiro88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (3)

Image
The Nature of Economics (3) A crucial defect of neoclassical economics related to the above discussion is that it analyzes seriously only markets, more specifically organized markets. It does not seriously analyze firms or households. It ignores government, the environment, and international relations. Although the real economy has a variety of market types, it treats all markets as the same type. Can the demand-supply analysis (with auctioneers) be applied to medical markets or education markets? This implies that neoclassical economics analyzes only a limited part of the economy. Although it deals with firms, it does not seriously analyze them in the sense that it fails to explain how a particular set of input levels achieves the level of output given by the production function. In other words, it does not describe the process of production or how production is carried out. Firms in the real economy try hard to improve their technologies. They also try to invent new products
Read more

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m
Read more

The Nature of Economics (2)

Image
The Nature of Economics (2) When a contract is incomplete as in the real world, the agents have discretion and face interdependence or a game situation. Each can influence the welfare of the other. Pursuit of self-interest in this situation is generally inefficient. This discretion includes many commonplace behaviors such as providing wrong information, doing shoddy work, and working slowly. They will surely decrease the welfare of the partners such as employers, employees, and consumers. The game situation can be described as the prisoner's dilemma game. It shows that pursuit of self-interest under contract incompleteness with discretion leads to inefficiency. For example, telling a lie is a strictly dominating strategy* in it but both players being honest is more efficient than both telling a lie. The above story suggests that individualism or unrestrained pursuit of self-interest cannot be justified in general. It may be loosely justified only in organized markets, suc
Read more