The Nature of Economics (1)


The Nature of Economics (1)
Many people believe that economics is a science that promotes the welfare of all human beings. However it is actually used to justify strategies of particular groups as in the case of free trade. Today’s economics is an ideology.
The basis of an ideology is formed first intuitively and then the whole is justified by cleverly applying logic. A widely used method of clever application of logic is to use only facts or assumptions that are convenient for justification.
Neoclassical economics or mainstream economics is an ideology that justifies individual freedom or individualism to the maximum. Because of its mathematical nature, we can easily know what assumptions are used in it. We can know further that it ignores many inconvenient facts.
One of the most important assumptions of neoclassical economics is contract completeness, which means that all transaction contracts are sufficiently detailed. Otherwise it cannot justify Western individualism. But how can you make sufficiently detailed labor contracts? Can a labor contract specify every move of a white-collar worker? How can contracts control what school teachers do in their classrooms? It would be astronomically costly to make such sufficiently detailed contracts in the real world.
Contracts are complete in neoclassical economics because it ignores transaction costs, i.e., it assumes they are zero. Transaction costs are what individuals need to bear in addition to the prices of the traded goods. Example are the costs of information collection, making contracts, and monitoring. The time spent for shopping is another example all people experience.
Since the costs of making contracts are assumed to be zero in neoclassical economics contrary to the real world, agents there can make complete contracts. By doing so, they are supposed to control their trading partners.
What if the partners violate the contracts? The partners are assumed not to violate them. They are assumed to perform the contracts under no legal system. In fact, neoclassical economics does not have governments or courts. It has so many unrealistic assumptions!

Comments and questions are welcome.
kazuhiro.arai888@gmail.com

Kazuhiro Arai’s English twitter:       　https://twitter.com/araikazuhiroe88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese twitter:　     https://twitter.com/araikazuhiro88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (7)

Image
The Nature of Economics (7) Neoclassical economics does not consider efficiency of the whole economy because the production function and utility function are exogenously given. Since I do not think that this point is made clear in books or papers, I would like to discuss it in some detail. Consider two economies E1 and E2. The workers in E1 are more cooperative and hard-working. Those in E2 are selfish and lazy. Hence, the labor productivity in the firm in E1 is higher for equally given levels of physical inputs. However both economies are efficient in neoclassical economics! Both E1 and E2 are efficient as far as all firms maximize their profits subject to exogenously given (different) production functions! It is obvious that E1 is more affluent than E2. I would like to emphasize that efficiency differs from affluence in neoclassical economics. Next consider two economies E3 and E4. The people in E3 are more harmonious and other-regarding within the household. Those in E4 ar...
Read more

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m...
Read more

7/11/2017 Why Japanese people are poor speakers of English

Image
              I think Japanese people are the poorest speakers of English in the world. There are several reasons for the poor ability. The first is that Japanese and English are completely different languages. The word orders of the two languages are almost opposite. For example, an object is placed before the corresponding verb in Japanese. The second is that there are virtually no etymological similarities between the words of the two languages. * Hence, it is hard for Japanese to memorize English words. The third is that few Japanese people have necessity for English speaking ability. Most university students can learn their specialized fields using Japanese textbooks only. Almost all businessmen work speaking Japanese. The fourth is that Japanese people rarely have opportunities to practice English. There are many Japanese who are interested in English and would like to speak it. However, an average Japanese does not have even one chance ...
Read more