Shusaku Endo’s Silence and Christianity (1)


Shusaku Endo’s Silence and Christianity (1)
              Many people may think that Shusaku Endo’s Silence is a masterpiece and especially Western Christians may enjoy reading it and watching the movie. I would like to claim however that it is a poor work with an ingrained bias of the Christian. The author has spread a barbarous image of Japanese people throughout the world. This is a completely wrong image.
First I would like to provide you with information that the author lived a few hundred meters away from my present home. The first photo below shows his residential area. From this you may obtain a bit of image of where he wrote Silence. He used to walk around this neighborhood. So do I sometimes but I have never met him because he had died before I moved in. His close redactor lived nearby.
              A key point for fair evaluation of Silence is to know that Christianity had been banned in Japan for a long time before missionary Giuseppe Chiara, the model of hero Sebastian Rodrigo in Silence, landed in Japan. It should be understood that restriction on religion was widespread in the world including Europe. It is also true even today in some countries. One should not evaluate Silence from the viewpoint of a modern man with freedom of religion.
Giuseppe Chiara landed in Japan in 1643 but Christian missionary deportation was ordered in 1587. In 1597 Nagasaki crucified twenty-six Christians, who were later included among catholic saints. I would like to say that these were actually criminals because they violated the ban. To make the point clear suppose that a group of people who believe opium consumption is good for their health promote it in a foreign country which bans it and that this country has crucified twenty-six opium consumers/promoters. Then which are they, saints or criminals?
              Why was Christianity banned in Japan? Christians destroyed Japanese temples and shrines, enslaved many Japanese especially women, and tried to colonize Japan. Japanese rulers were once generous to Christianity, but after seeing these barbarous acts of Christians, they tried to exclude them form Japan. Ignoring these facts, Endo beautified Christianity and Christian missionary work.

Comments and questions are welcome.
kazuhiro.arai888@gmail.com

Kazuhiro Arai’s English twitter:       　https://twitter.com/araikazuhiroe88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese twitter:　     https://twitter.com/araikazuhiro88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (3)

Image
The Nature of Economics (3) A crucial defect of neoclassical economics related to the above discussion is that it analyzes seriously only markets, more specifically organized markets. It does not seriously analyze firms or households. It ignores government, the environment, and international relations. Although the real economy has a variety of market types, it treats all markets as the same type. Can the demand-supply analysis (with auctioneers) be applied to medical markets or education markets? This implies that neoclassical economics analyzes only a limited part of the economy. Although it deals with firms, it does not seriously analyze them in the sense that it fails to explain how a particular set of input levels achieves the level of output given by the production function. In other words, it does not describe the process of production or how production is carried out. Firms in the real economy try hard to improve their technologies. They also try to invent new products
Read more

The Nature of Economics (7)

Image
The Nature of Economics (7) Neoclassical economics does not consider efficiency of the whole economy because the production function and utility function are exogenously given. Since I do not think that this point is made clear in books or papers, I would like to discuss it in some detail. Consider two economies E1 and E2. The workers in E1 are more cooperative and hard-working. Those in E2 are selfish and lazy. Hence, the labor productivity in the firm in E1 is higher for equally given levels of physical inputs. However both economies are efficient in neoclassical economics! Both E1 and E2 are efficient as far as all firms maximize their profits subject to exogenously given (different) production functions! It is obvious that E1 is more affluent than E2. I would like to emphasize that efficiency differs from affluence in neoclassical economics. Next consider two economies E3 and E4. The people in E3 are more harmonious and other-regarding within the household. Those in E4 ar
Read more

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m
Read more