Why USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1)


Why USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1)
              USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to kill hundreds thousands of Japanese people and tortured many survivors for a long time. An a-bomb is so massively destructive that it cannot be used without insanity. The acts of having dropped a-bombs can be rightly compared to Nazi’s Holocaust. Indeed, the method of killing by a-bombs was much more inhuman than by a poison gas.
              American people have been taught in school and broadcast that the bombing was necessary to end the war and save a million American lives. However, this is a completely fabricated story to justify the mass destruction and to reduce the consciousness of sin of American people. Well before the bombing the Japanese had already lost ability to fight the war and been trying to surrender.
The followings are the true fundamental reasons for the use of a-bombs. The first is that USA wanted to demonstrate its military strength to the world and especially to the Soviet Union by dropping the bombs and displaying their destructive power. It wanted to prove that it was No.1 in the world and trying to surpass it would be fruitless.
The second reason is that it wanted to conduct human experiments for the newly devised weapon. USA investigated the effects of the atomic bombing on human bodies in detail. In order to obtain data, it even ‘invited’ some seriously wounded survivors ‘for treatments.’ Some bodies are preserved in formalin for further investigation.
The third reason is that USA thought that the Japanese were suitable for the experiments because they are racially and religiously different from most Americans. Judeo-Christian religions are exceptionally exclusive in the sense that they allow killing people of other religions. Americans did not and still do not have strong consciousness of sin regarding massively killing people of different religions.

Comments and questions are welcome.
kazuhiro.arai888@gmail.com

Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/
Kazuhiro Arai’s English Twitter:        https://twitter.com/araikazuhiroe88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese Twitter:      https://twitter.com/araikazuhiro88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (3)

Image
The Nature of Economics (3) A crucial defect of neoclassical economics related to the above discussion is that it analyzes seriously only markets, more specifically organized markets. It does not seriously analyze firms or households. It ignores government, the environment, and international relations. Although the real economy has a variety of market types, it treats all markets as the same type. Can the demand-supply analysis (with auctioneers) be applied to medical markets or education markets? This implies that neoclassical economics analyzes only a limited part of the economy. Although it deals with firms, it does not seriously analyze them in the sense that it fails to explain how a particular set of input levels achieves the level of output given by the production function. In other words, it does not describe the process of production or how production is carried out. Firms in the real economy try hard to improve their technologies. They also try to invent new products
Read more

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m
Read more

The Nature of Economics (2)

Image
The Nature of Economics (2) When a contract is incomplete as in the real world, the agents have discretion and face interdependence or a game situation. Each can influence the welfare of the other. Pursuit of self-interest in this situation is generally inefficient. This discretion includes many commonplace behaviors such as providing wrong information, doing shoddy work, and working slowly. They will surely decrease the welfare of the partners such as employers, employees, and consumers. The game situation can be described as the prisoner's dilemma game. It shows that pursuit of self-interest under contract incompleteness with discretion leads to inefficiency. For example, telling a lie is a strictly dominating strategy* in it but both players being honest is more efficient than both telling a lie. The above story suggests that individualism or unrestrained pursuit of self-interest cannot be justified in general. It may be loosely justified only in organized markets, suc
Read more