Why USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1)


Why USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1)
              USA dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to kill hundreds thousands of Japanese people and tortured many survivors for a long time. An a-bomb is so massively destructive that it cannot be used without insanity. The acts of having dropped a-bombs can be rightly compared to Nazi’s Holocaust. Indeed, the method of killing by a-bombs was much more inhuman than by a poison gas.
              American people have been taught in school and broadcast that the bombing was necessary to end the war and save a million American lives. However, this is a completely fabricated story to justify the mass destruction and to reduce the consciousness of sin of American people. Well before the bombing the Japanese had already lost ability to fight the war and been trying to surrender.
The followings are the true fundamental reasons for the use of a-bombs. The first is that USA wanted to demonstrate its military strength to the world and especially to the Soviet Union by dropping the bombs and displaying their destructive power. It wanted to prove that it was No.1 in the world and trying to surpass it would be fruitless.
The second reason is that it wanted to conduct human experiments for the newly devised weapon. USA investigated the effects of the atomic bombing on human bodies in detail. In order to obtain data, it even ‘invited’ some seriously wounded survivors ‘for treatments.’ Some bodies are preserved in formalin for further investigation.
The third reason is that USA thought that the Japanese were suitable for the experiments because they are racially and religiously different from most Americans. Judeo-Christian religions are exceptionally exclusive in the sense that they allow killing people of other religions. Americans did not and still do not have strong consciousness of sin regarding massively killing people of different religions.

Comments and questions are welcome.
kazuhiro.arai888@gmail.com

Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/
Kazuhiro Arai’s English Twitter:        https://twitter.com/araikazuhiroe88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese Twitter:      https://twitter.com/araikazuhiro88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (7)

Image
The Nature of Economics (7) Neoclassical economics does not consider efficiency of the whole economy because the production function and utility function are exogenously given. Since I do not think that this point is made clear in books or papers, I would like to discuss it in some detail. Consider two economies E1 and E2. The workers in E1 are more cooperative and hard-working. Those in E2 are selfish and lazy. Hence, the labor productivity in the firm in E1 is higher for equally given levels of physical inputs. However both economies are efficient in neoclassical economics! Both E1 and E2 are efficient as far as all firms maximize their profits subject to exogenously given (different) production functions! It is obvious that E1 is more affluent than E2. I would like to emphasize that efficiency differs from affluence in neoclassical economics. Next consider two economies E3 and E4. The people in E3 are more harmonious and other-regarding within the household. Those in E4 ar...
Read more

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m...
Read more

7/11/2017 Why Japanese people are poor speakers of English

Image
              I think Japanese people are the poorest speakers of English in the world. There are several reasons for the poor ability. The first is that Japanese and English are completely different languages. The word orders of the two languages are almost opposite. For example, an object is placed before the corresponding verb in Japanese. The second is that there are virtually no etymological similarities between the words of the two languages. * Hence, it is hard for Japanese to memorize English words. The third is that few Japanese people have necessity for English speaking ability. Most university students can learn their specialized fields using Japanese textbooks only. Almost all businessmen work speaking Japanese. The fourth is that Japanese people rarely have opportunities to practice English. There are many Japanese who are interested in English and would like to speak it. However, an average Japanese does not have even one chance ...
Read more