7/3/2018 Prevent China’s expansion!


Chinese people are almost everywhere in the world. Japanese universities are full of Chinese students. My impression is that about a half foreign students are Chinese. They are better at the Japanese language than other foreign students, but poorer at mathematics, economics, and English. Many of them are unable to read English books.
I feel that Chinese female students lack elegance. When I talked about this to some professors, they agreed. Many Chinese visit Japan for sightseeing and their bad manners make most Japanese people dislike them. Chinese are disliked in most countries including Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, which have many Chinese immigrants.
On the other hand, Chinese government is trying to establish footholds in many countries for economic and military expansion. China is the world’s only country that is obsessed with expansionism today. It annexed Tibet, Turkestan, and part of Mongolia. It claims that Taiwan belongs to it. It is now trying openly to take the Senkaku Islands from Japan and even the Okinawa Islands.
Its strategy for expansion is to send a few Chinese people first to the target area. Then it sends gradually more and more and eventually make the area full of Chinese people. It is also trying to conquer the world using money and deceit.
Chinese ‘leaders’ have huge amounts of money in their foreign bank accounts. They seem to have accumulated the money illegally. They are always prepared to flee overseas whenever a ‘revolution’ breaks out. China is an extremely unequal society.
Chinese people do not have freedom of speech nor do they have free access to internet information including that about the Tiananmen Square incident. The government controls available information. It has no noble idea. Only money is important to Chinese. If China had conquered the world, either oppression or chaos would arise. Do you want to live in a country like China? Countries in the world, unite to prevent its expansion!

Comments and questions are welcome.
Email: kazuhiro.arai888@gmail.com

Kazuhiro Arai’s English twitter:        https://twitter.com/araikazuhiroe88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese twitter:      https://twitter.com/araikazuhiro88
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m
Read more

The Nature of Economics (3)

Image
The Nature of Economics (3) A crucial defect of neoclassical economics related to the above discussion is that it analyzes seriously only markets, more specifically organized markets. It does not seriously analyze firms or households. It ignores government, the environment, and international relations. Although the real economy has a variety of market types, it treats all markets as the same type. Can the demand-supply analysis (with auctioneers) be applied to medical markets or education markets? This implies that neoclassical economics analyzes only a limited part of the economy. Although it deals with firms, it does not seriously analyze them in the sense that it fails to explain how a particular set of input levels achieves the level of output given by the production function. In other words, it does not describe the process of production or how production is carried out. Firms in the real economy try hard to improve their technologies. They also try to invent new products
Read more

The Nature of Economics (7)

Image
The Nature of Economics (7) Neoclassical economics does not consider efficiency of the whole economy because the production function and utility function are exogenously given. Since I do not think that this point is made clear in books or papers, I would like to discuss it in some detail. Consider two economies E1 and E2. The workers in E1 are more cooperative and hard-working. Those in E2 are selfish and lazy. Hence, the labor productivity in the firm in E1 is higher for equally given levels of physical inputs. However both economies are efficient in neoclassical economics! Both E1 and E2 are efficient as far as all firms maximize their profits subject to exogenously given (different) production functions! It is obvious that E1 is more affluent than E2. I would like to emphasize that efficiency differs from affluence in neoclassical economics. Next consider two economies E3 and E4. The people in E3 are more harmonious and other-regarding within the household. Those in E4 ar
Read more