13/11/2017 Tokyo is exciting!

             Tokyo is a very exciting city. There are several reasons.
First, it has so many attractive restaurants full of variety. I guarantee that anyone from any part of the world would be satisfied with the food. Moreover, the number of high quality restaurants by the Michelin standard is larger in Tokyo than in any other city in the world.
Second, you can get almost anything in the shops. You can buy any electronic and even rocket parts in Akihabara, which is well-known among many people in the world. Tokyo has huge bookstores that enable you to spend a whole day reading new books there. Jimbocho street is famous for antiquarian and secondhand bookshops. You can enjoy even natural hot springs near the center of Tokyo*.
Third, high-quality arts are available every day in Tokyo, which has many theaters, concert halls, and museums. You can easily gain access to top-class orchestral music, ballet, kabuki, etc.
              Fourth, there are many events and festivals going on every day. For example, it has more than one hundred universities, which have open lectures and symposiums regularly. There are countless clubs and groups that are open to the public for studies, hobbies, and diversions. Many kinds of festivals are held every year by citizens, department stores, local governments, etc.
              Fifth, Tokyo has a lot of places of historical interest. It is no exaggeration to say that every kilometer you walk will take you to another historical place. Kamakura, which is about 50 km away from the center of Tokyo, has temples and gardens that are about 800 years old.
              Sixth, Tokyo is the center of business and culture of Japan, which quite easily enables people sharing the same interest to meet each other. Those who graduated from the same university can meet quite easily, too. Incidentally, Tokyo has an extremely convenient train system.
Come and live in Tokyo! It would never bore you.

*The center of Tokyo normally means the area that has the Imperial Palace, the Diet Building, and Tokyo station.


Comments are welcome.
Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese blog:         　https://araikazuhiro.blogspot.jp/

Kazuhiro Arai’s Japanese home page:   http://araikazuhiro.world.coocan.jp/





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Nature of Economics (3)

Image
The Nature of Economics (3) A crucial defect of neoclassical economics related to the above discussion is that it analyzes seriously only markets, more specifically organized markets. It does not seriously analyze firms or households. It ignores government, the environment, and international relations. Although the real economy has a variety of market types, it treats all markets as the same type. Can the demand-supply analysis (with auctioneers) be applied to medical markets or education markets? This implies that neoclassical economics analyzes only a limited part of the economy. Although it deals with firms, it does not seriously analyze them in the sense that it fails to explain how a particular set of input levels achieves the level of output given by the production function. In other words, it does not describe the process of production or how production is carried out. Firms in the real economy try hard to improve their technologies. They also try to invent new products
Read more

The Nature of Economics (7)

Image
The Nature of Economics (7) Neoclassical economics does not consider efficiency of the whole economy because the production function and utility function are exogenously given. Since I do not think that this point is made clear in books or papers, I would like to discuss it in some detail. Consider two economies E1 and E2. The workers in E1 are more cooperative and hard-working. Those in E2 are selfish and lazy. Hence, the labor productivity in the firm in E1 is higher for equally given levels of physical inputs. However both economies are efficient in neoclassical economics! Both E1 and E2 are efficient as far as all firms maximize their profits subject to exogenously given (different) production functions! It is obvious that E1 is more affluent than E2. I would like to emphasize that efficiency differs from affluence in neoclassical economics. Next consider two economies E3 and E4. The people in E3 are more harmonious and other-regarding within the household. Those in E4 ar
Read more

The Nature of Economics (5)

Image
The Nature of Economics (5) We see here a good example for the fact that the values researchers possess affect their choice of the topic and method of research generating bias in ‘scientific works.’ 　 Researchers who want to support individualism do not analyze firms or households seriously. They simply introduce exogenously given production functions and utility functions. Economists tend to ignore or distort social aspects that are inconvenient to build models with conclusions they like. It is really hard to establish social sciences that are value-free. Researchers need to recognize this. On the other hand, a unified theoretical model may be formed to explain the cultural difference mentioned in the example given in the above third reason. It may be done by introducing a measure of the degree of cooperativeness as an exogenous variable. In such a model different types of equilibrium may arise for different values of the measure. If we can endogenize the variable for that m
Read more